I am getting worried.

The hysteria seems to me to be getting out of control. Look at this:
A new Christian movement that seeks to take dominion over politics, business and culture in preparation for the end times and Jesus' return is becoming more of a presence in American politics. Rachel Tabachnick, who researches the religious right, explains its beliefs and influences. (1)
Now I don’t know about you, but when any religion seeks to take over the world I get worried. But when Americans who live in the Land of the Free begin talking about converting EVERYONE to a fundamentalist form of Christianity so we can bring about the “End time” I get really worried.
“What if I don’t believe in the end time and the second coming of Christ?” “Well bubba, we will just convert you.” “How?” “We will first cast out the demons that inhabit you, then you will be converted.” “I have demons?” “We all have demons. We are going to cast out the world class demons and convert all the Muslims in one go!” “How about queers?” “Yup, demons.” “Atheists?” “Yup.” “Jews? Gypsies? Hindus? Catholics?” “Yup, all of them. Demons.”
Now I ask you, how do you argue that mentality? And they are getting powerful. They are running Rick Perry for President. They are supporting Bachmann. They are scary. We don’t need guns to protect us from the government. We need guns to protect us from these dangerous wack jobs. Christians my ass. These guys are psychopaths. Uh, excuse me. Apostle Psychopath if you please.
1. http://www.npr.org/2011/08/24/139781021/the-evangelicals-engaged-in-spiritual-warfare
Image: http://www.onepennysheet.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/charismatic-preacher.jpg

Words Spoken

You know the old adages about once an arrow is loosed it cannot be called back? And the transfer of that to a word spoken? Probably now would be a good time to reflect on that, for me for sure, and maybe you too.
Everyone gets insulted or dissed or overlooked at some time in their lives. A natural tendency is to lash out verbally with some nasty remark like “up yours, asshole” or worse, say something that is usually a deleted epithet that relates to race, religion or country of origin. Or let out some secret that you know would hurt but have never revealed. The goal, then, is to hurt.
The problem is the arrow thing. Once you call somebody something, or diss them, it is impossible to retrieve the words. And don’t think for a moment that they are ever forgotten. Forgiven maybe, but never, never forgotten. I remember an early “race” movie where a black woman was going to marry the love of her life, a white man, and she was his, too. Her mother was against the marriage and said “Some day he is going to get angry and call you a Nigger. Then what will you do?” Forgive if possible, but forget? I doubt it. And I don’t remember how the movie came out. But I never forgot that line.
The moral: be very careful what you say to others, in person or in writing. The echo will go on forever.
Image: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCKDxomA81XPrV7S9oNxU0x1V9P3HjuORpv-ik97lu4tsU5sockTbeO2F2PQUj7EKnIK0Yen1stZVDk91pI3YwVRGc77q1w1pDxMfsfl9AvVAwHXF9tusl6ju8WOPDMcHiQNRC7qQ14mE/s1600/Power-of-Words.gif

Shrimp on treadmills and other Science

I admit up front that sometimes the things scientists do sound strange, funny or even stupid. Take the experiments on hamster testicles. Microsurgery on the vas deferens to sterilize male hamsters. This got a William Proxmire “Golden Fleece Award” for wasting taxpayer’s money. Yet the research led directly to the Vasectomy surgery performed on millions of men successfully every year. Or Paul Ekman’s research on facial expressions that has led to the decoding of facial expressions and is partly responsible for the successful system used by Israel and TSA screeners in the quest for terrorists.
Admittedly some research looks goofy. For example someone did a study to find out why prisoners want to get out of jail. The point is this: science at the front end is an easy target for anyone that doesn’t understand what science is all about.
So what is science all about you ask? At the core, it is about asking questions and getting answers. Sometimes the questions seem silly and sometimes not. Politicians like to make headlines by uncovering “waste and fraud” and being vigilante watchdogs of public funds. They still fill the budget with “turkeys” and “earmarks”, and they still piss away millions of dollars a year on “fact finding” trips all over the world, and they still take money from lobbyists who control the legislative process.
And shrimp? This research is looking at the effects of pollution on the physiology of crustaceans and is related to the recent oil spills. Not a bad investment. And the total spent was only $1000. Still, it sounds silly and makes the “Government” look bad to some.
Image: http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/061018/061018_shrimpTreadmill_hmed_2p.grid-6x2.jpg

More Dead than Dead.

Whoa! Wait a minute. More dead than dead? Deader than dead?
Yup. A study cited below (1) focused on Persistent Vegetative State (PVS) people as being perceived as worse off than dead. I agree. I would rather be dead than kept in a PVS. But not for the same reasons as the people who form the basis of the conclusions of this study. No, those people believe in an afterlife, where brain function remains intact, perception of the world remains intact and intelligence remains intact. After the brain is long gone. The study found that as religiosity increased so did the notion that PVS was a “deader” form of dead than being really dead.
Confused? No need. All you have to do is put yourself into the mindset of the after lifers to get it. If you are not brain dead you obviously are still conscious and sentient. If you are dead, then you have gone to the afterlife where you are once again conscious and sentient. So, the in-between, PVS, where there is no consciousness and no sentience is “more dead than dead”. Simple.
Two things though: I have a hard time thinking that people who actually believe that there is an afterlife are really sentient, and I don’t want to lay around in a PVS being an expense and psychological burden on my loved ones.
As for me: Pull the Plug and Let Me Go. Where? No Where.

1. DEAD: K. Gray, T.A. Knickman and D.M. Wegner. More dead than dead: Perceptions of persons in the persistent vegetative state. Cognition. Published online July 27, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.014. Abstract available: [Go to]
Image: http://www.filmofilia.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/after.life_.jpg

No Knee-jerks Here.

While researching Rudolf Brazda I came across a YouTube video with an unpleasant title: Why Homosexuality Should be Banned. Given my own thoughts on the matter I considered ripping the computer out of the wall, but thought “No, don’t be an asshole like the knee-jerk homophobes.” So I watched it. And boy, am I glad I did.
This is a gem of a home produced video that destroys the myths of homosexuality in a series of arguments designed to attack homosexuality. A beautiful piece of creative art that will make the most ardent homophobe at least stop and, oops, I was going to write “think”, but we know homophobes don’t think. They jerk.

Do youself a real favor whether you are a supporter of equal rights or a supporter of limited rights, and watch this video. You will never be the same again.

Anti homosexual video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&NR=1&v=lSfFa44p96o
Rudolf Brazda video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=x-1uFsOXWhQ
Image:http://images.sodahead.com/polls/001741905/923692305_polls_NoHomosexuals_5523_899800_answer_3_xlarge_xlarge.gif

Montsegur: Twelfth Century Holocaust

The Cathar's origin is a bit clouded, but they had influences from many religions. Buddhism, Hindu and Christianity all were there in some form. By the 12th century the core was Christian. But not the “Church” version. Rather an admixture of philosophies and beliefs, with one fatal tenant: They refused to accept the Pope as the spiritual leader of all Christians and were therefore declared heretics. Thousands were burned alive after refusing to accept the Church and the Pope.
I wanted to visit one of the last holdouts of this peaceful people, the mountain top refuge called Montsegur, located in the Midi Pyrnees in southwest France. Six hundred Cathars were besieged in this tiny redoubt for 10 months and eventually more than 200 were burned alive. The original structure was destroyed after the siege and rebuilt twice since, the current iteration known as Montsegur III. Little of the original remains.
I hoped to find a palpable sense of spirit in and around the castle (called the “Chateau” by locals) but felt only vague whispers. Sal and I made the steep climb, walked over the entire site and then went into the village for a glass of wine. The experience, while not the spiritual one I expected was none-the-less emotional. Simply being on the site of the massacre brought the history vividly to the present. The horrors of the Church, in the name of their “God”, were present in every corner of the area. As with any holocaust site, this one has a profound message for mankind: be vigilant and do not let this happen again. Yet we seem doomed to repeat the barbarism of extermination. I can personally name a few dozen “holocausts” that have occurred during the history of mankind. I am sure many are forgotten or went unrecorded. I wonder how many have been perpetrated in the name of some religion. Or with the tacit approval of some religious leader. Or by the warriors of a religion?
Just wondering. And BTW, it’s not over yet.
Image: Sal and Woody at Montsegur
See also: http://searchesworld.blogspot.com/2011/07/they-sang-as-they-burned.html

Mystery Snake Finally Caught, Revised

(The revision is correcting the identification of the snake and adding the video.)

This spring we finally saw the culprit that was eating our goldfish. A very spooky water snake. I tried several times to sneak up on it but to no avail. In desperation I bought a snake trap, baited it with "Just Mice" paste and waited for 2 months. All I ever caught was a snake skin that was actually shed in the trap while we were in France.
Three days ago I decided to just put the trap in the water, on a shelf in the pond and see what happened. What happened was it started to catch tadpoles. A few the first day, several more the second and by last night there were more than a dozen bullfrog babies in the trap. And that was enough to entice the hungry snake into the trap. This morning I found I had traded tadpoles for a water snake. He/she turned out to be a Florida red belly water snake Nerodia erythrogaster erythrogaster. About medium size and very "bitey". I can't get a good photo in the trap, so I will take a video of the release later today as I give it a holiday in Lake Jackson. Miles from my pond! My hat is off to the trap people for making a good product, but the advice to use mouse paste was not quite on the mark. I am writing them to suggest they make a new product and call it "Just Tadpoles and Frogs". Yummmmm.
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojPLCU6o7rQ
Image: http://students.ncwc.edu/bio401/2005/Christopher/red%20belly%20water%20snake.jpg
Snake Traps:http://www.bugspray.com/catalog/traps/snake_traps.html

People Just Get Out Of The Way!!!

"If all insects on Earth disappeared, within 50 years all life on
Earth would end. If all human beings disappeared from the Earth,
within 50 years all forms of life would flourish."
— Biologist Jonas Salk

Assuming that the above quote is essentially stating the truth, and I think it is absolutely spot on, tell me this: Why should we do anything to promote our own survival? You would think that an intelligent species that is decimating the world would come to the conclusion that they should just get out of the way. Hell, even NASCAR drivers do it.
The Question restated: Can anyone think of any valid reason at all for the continuance of the Human race? Besides the selfish gene theory? Maybe so we can do good? At what price? I hate to admit that I can’t.
On the other hand, if is going to end, I would prefer it to end after I finish the wine in the cellar. And that, my friends, is exactly the problem.
Image: http://www.examiner.com/images/blog/wysiwyg/image/nobabies.jpg

Ishmael and the Starving Children

The book “Ishmael” has been around for a while, and when a friend gave it to me to read recently I thought after finishing “I am Ishmael”. My conclusions are the same: agriculture changed the human paradigm for ever, for the worse. Never truer than today. Millions of people starving to death in Northern Africa. The stated cause: Drought and crop failure. That is complete rubbish. The cause is simply too many people trying to live on too little arable land. And the land gets less arable as global climate change drives the droughts.
The conundrum is this: if we let the millions starve and die, them the population will be reduced to the survivors who might have a chance to survive the coming disasters of weather. If we feed them they will survive and have more babies and further degrade the environment in which they live. The civilized answer is “feed them”.
But wait! Where does the food come from? Ah, therein lies the rub. It comes from the world’s nations that have surplus food production, and they also have population increases and they also have climate-related problems with agriculture. So what happens when the starving of the world are starving and we don’t have surpluses to give them? Do we starve ourselves to feed them?

(By the way, You are responsible for all the starving children in Africa today. Yes, You. You wanted their parents fed 20 years ago, and now their children are starving. At least take responsibility for that.)
Don’t turn away from this discussion friends. It is just around the corner.
Image: http://misstila.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Starving-Child-5.jpeg
Ishmael the novel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishmael_(novel)

Cognitive Sewage

I love this term: “Cognitive Sewage”. Just has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it? I heard it this morning during a discussion on NPR about the shortage of drinking water looming in the near future and the nearly endless supply of treated water from sewer treatment plants. Drinkable water. That no one wants to drink. Why not? The simple answer is the “yuck” factor.
Your brain scores the effluent as “yucky”, relates it to sewage and you refuse to consider drinking it. Even though it may be significantly cleaner than the water in the river or ground that is the source of your current drinking water. Powerful associations in the brain make you recoil at the thought of drinking the stuff.
I remember a conversation I had with a sanitary engineer who was overseeing the installation of a small treatment plant at a trailer park where I lived. This would be around 1969 or so. The small plant, he said, would produce drinkable water at the outflow. The outflow was piped into a sinkhole at the edge of the property. I offered to get him a glass, and he said “no thanks, I’m not thirsty.” Neither was I. The water in the Mississippi river is sewage effluent. Ever been to Nawleans? Yup, you drank sewage effluent.
Think of all the cognitive sewage you have floating around in your brain. Fears, phobias, irrational ideas about certain types of people. Think about it. I put Republicans in that category, and conservative religious nutters. Maybe it’s time to flush the toilet of our minds and start over? For me, that starts in the voting booth.

http://www.uncoverage.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Sewage-treatment-plant-in-Encino-where-the-magic-happens.jpg